@safetitude: We pros need to make strategy with action plan for implementation as how to influence attitude for safety. The pro safety attitude, called SAFETITUDE will help reduce accidents.
@safetitude: 6-Steps Total Safety Culture Model Further, an extension to 2 earlier posts that intended to enhance Safety performance and to build and establish a Total Safety Culture (TSC), this is one proprietary designed model as a guide to the journey. The strategy can be started with a small model with a selection of a change agent ( a worker with right safety attitude and zealous to take forward) and making him work through various stages of the model. Once one cycle is established, this can be repeated on the bigger scale until every worker in a business unit is covered. This also can be extended to higher management members in a later phase of implementation.
Very often at construction site or another, issue of protection from electrical shock in event of leakage/fault currents from portable electrical tools/machines e.g. welding machine surfaces. Safety practitioners struggle a lot to ensure that electrical shock related injuries do not happen while using such portable electrical machinery. But it always remains a question of debate as which provides the best protection, ELCB or Body earthing or combination of both. I would like here to explain the importance of Body earthing.. Good integrated earthing system is indispensable for touch shock or protection of machine from damage and fire. The selection of earth wire of suitable capacity and material is key to the protection and integrity of it is even more important. Robust earthing gives active protection against the touch shock and saves life. Contrary to this ELCB is a passive protection against the danger and if it malfunctions or ...
Thank you for your overwhelming valuable comments/suggestion etc. on "Beware of LTIFR-It's DECEPTIVE". I would like to state here that, through this write up, I only affirmed views of many safety practitioners. I would also like to say here, there is no harm in computing and publishing LTIFR. The only request I wanted to make here that LTIFR is unable to provide you any inference. A zero or near zero value may not reflect the underlying safety weaknesses of the organisation rather it renders the organisation complacence and in turn many good efforts in the direction of reducing injury are lessened or given up. Contrary to this, big number discourages the organisation and makes it feel low on this account. As such your LTIFR should not drive your safety programs and action strategy. The gist of the point is, we should keep our efforts directed towards reducing the ARBs-at-risk behaviours of the workers and increase SBs-safe behaviours on strong foundation of ...
Comments
Post a Comment